On editorial practice and peer review

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 13 (4):699-701 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00800.x

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,459

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The assessment of criterion audit cycles by external peer review – when is an audit not an audit?Paul Bowie, Sarah Cooke, Penny Lo, John McKay & Murray Lough - 2007 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 13 (3):352-357.
An educational programme for peer review groups to improve treatment of chronic heart failure and diabetes mellitus type 2 in general practice.Willeke N. Kasje, Petra Denig, Roy E. Stewart, Pieter A. de Graeff & Flora M. Haaijer-Ruskamp - 2006 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12 (6):613-621.
Peer Review and Beyond: Towards a Dialogical Approach of Quality in Ethics Support.Guy A. M. Widdershoven, Bert Molewijk & Suzanne Metselaar - 2018 - In Stuart G. Finder & Mark J. Bliton (eds.), Peer Review, Peer Education, and Modeling in the Practice of Clinical Ethics Consultation: The Zadeh Project. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 193-203.
External feedback in general practice: a focus group study of trained peer reviewers of significant event analyses.John McKay, Lindsey Pope, Paul Bowie & Murray Lough - 2009 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (1):142-147.
The UK National Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Resources and Outcomes Project – a feasibility study of large‐scale clinical service peer review.Christopher M. Roberts, Rhona J. Buckingham, Robert A. Stone, Derek Lowe & Michael G. Pearson - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (5):927-932.
Variations in the ability of general medical practitioners to apply two methods of clinical audit: a five‐year study of assessment by peer review.John McKay, Paul Bowie & Murray Lough - 2006 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12 (6):622-629.
Explicit versus implicit review to explore combination antipsychotic prescribing.Amanda Wheeler - 2009 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (4):685-691.
A randomized trial of peer review: the UK National Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Resources and Outcomes Project: three‐year evaluation.Christopher M. Roberts, Robert A. Stone, Rhona J. Buckingham, Nancy A. Pursey, Derek Lowe & Jonathan M. Potter - 2012 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (3):599-605.
Clinical research methods for the new millennium.Bruce G. Charlton Md - 1999 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 5 (2):251-263.
Peer Review and Responsibility in/as/for/to Practice.Stuart G. Finder & Mark J. Bliton - 2018 - In Stuart G. Finder & Mark J. Bliton (eds.), Peer Review, Peer Education, and Modeling in the Practice of Clinical Ethics Consultation: The Zadeh Project. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 207-228.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-03

Downloads
38 (#599,835)

6 months
4 (#1,272,377)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references