The No-Where and The Now-Here: Ernst Bloch’s Concrete Utopia

Critical Horizons 25 (4):315-328 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The concept of utopia was abandoned over the years, mainly following the tragic events of the twentieth century which led to the rejection of the grand narratives that characterized modernity. But the challenges of our time invite a rethinking of the concept. The purpose of this article is to offer a non-nostalgic understanding of the concept of utopia through an analysis of Ernst Bloch’s paradoxical concept of “concrete utopia”. My intention is, first, to trace back the genealogy of the concept of the concrete to offer a non-trivial understanding, of it; and, second, to emphasize the importance of the concrete in the creation of the new. I argue that this understanding, coupled with a nuanced way of thinking about the relationship between the present and the future, allows us to reject the simple metaphysical dichotomy between the two. This does not mean sacrificing the present for the sake of the future or vice versa but perceiving the present as containing future possibilities within it. In this way, we can think of utopia as neither a hypothetical ideal (no-where) nor an empirical fact (now-here), but as the no-where of the now-here. That is, as a process of becoming.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-12-13

Downloads
2 (#1,950,839)

6 months
2 (#1,735,380)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

God, Death, and Time.Emmanuel Lévinas - 2000 - Stanford University Press.
The Principle of Hope.Ernst Bloch - 1988 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 23 (3):177-180.
The spirit of Utopia.Ernst Bloch - 2000 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.

View all 6 references / Add more references