Utilitarianism : Bentham and Rashdall

In Roger Crisp, The Oxford Handbook of the History of Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 292 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter argues that the modern understanding of the appeal of utilitarianism does not fit all of the utilitarians. Focusing on the views of Bentham and Rashdall, it begins by discussing the character of Bentham's utilitarianism and his arguments for utilitarianism, and then considers Rashdall's criticisms of deontologists and hedonistic utilitarians.

Other Versions

original Shaver, Robert (2013) "Utilitarianism and Egoism in Sidgwickian Ethics". Revue D’Études Benthamiennes 12():

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,467

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-17

Downloads
39 (#637,248)

6 months
2 (#1,367,529)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rob Shaver
University of Manitoba

Citations of this work

Bentham’s Binary Form of Maximizing Utilitarianism.Johan E. Gustafsson - 2018 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26 (1):87-109.
Rashdall, Hastings.Anthony Skelton - 2013 - In Hugh LaFollette, The International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references