Using non-human primates to benefit humans: research and organ transplantation

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 17 (4):573-578 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Emerging biotechnology may soon allow the creation of genetically human organs inside animals, with non-human primates and pigs being the best candidate species. This prospect raises the question of whether creating organs in primates in order to then transplant them into humans would be more acceptable than using them for research. In this paper, we examine the validity of the purported moral distinction between primates and other animals, and analyze the ethical acceptability of using primates to create organs for human use.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Non-human primates: the appropriate subjects of biomedical research?M. Quigley - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (11):655-658.
Intending and perceiving. Two forgotten components of social norms.J. Call - 2000 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 7 (1-2):34-38.
Intending and perceiving.Josep Call - 2000 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 7 (1-2):34-38.
Is the Use of Animal Organs for Transplants Morally Acceptable?Rui-Peng Lei - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 5:49-61.
The use of non-human primates in research.Kate Chatfield & David Morton - 2017 - In Doris Schroeder, Julie Cook, François Hirsch, Solveig Fenet & Vasantha Muthuswamy (eds.), Ethics Dumping: Case Studies from North-South Research Collaborations. New York: Springer. pp. 81-90.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-09-07

Downloads
38 (#590,964)

6 months
6 (#851,951)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David M. Shaw
University of Basel

References found in this work

What is it like to be a bat?Thomas Nagel - 1974 - Philosophical Review 83 (4):435-50.
What is it like to be a bat?Thomas Nagel - 1979 - In Mortal questions. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 435 - 450.
What is it Like to be a Bat?Thomas Nagel - 2003 - In John Heil (ed.), Philosophy of Mind: A Guide and Anthology. New York: Oxford University Press.
What is it like to be a bat?Thomas Nagel - 2004 - In Tim Crane & Katalin Farkas (eds.), Metaphysics: a guide and anthology. New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 7 references / Add more references