- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Born to Die?: Deciding the Fate of Critically Ill Newborns
(1986)
Abstract
Argues that is is not a moral crime to let severely defective newborns die naturally and that parents, not legal authorities, should make the ultimate decision.Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
"Born to Die? Deciding the Fate of Critically Ill Newborns", by Earl E. Shelp. [REVIEW]Stephen Wear - 1987 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 12 (3):297.
Earl E. Shelp, Born to Die? Deciding the Fate of Critically Ill Newborns, The Free Press, New York, 1986, 250 pp., hardcover, U.S. $19.95. [REVIEW]Stephen Wear - 1987 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 12 (3):297-304.
Deciding to Forego Life-Sustaining Treatment a Report on the Ethical, Medical, and Legal Issues in Treatment Decisions.United States - 1983 - President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research for Sale by the Supt. Of Docs., U.S. G.P.O.
Potential for personhood: A measure of life the severely defective newborn, legal implications of a social-medical dilemma. [REVIEW]Claire Thomas - 1980 - Bioethics Quarterly 2 (3):164-193.
The Groningen protocol: another perspective.A. B. Jotkowitz - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (3):157-158.
The moral status of the newborn and its implications for medical decision making.Lainie Friedman Ross - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (5):349-355.
From Birth to Death? A Personalist Approach to End-of-Life Care of Severely Ill Newborns.Chris Gastmans, Gunnar Naulaers, Chris Vanhole & Yvonne Denier - 2013 - Christian Bioethics 19 (1):7-24.
Severely Disabled Newborns.Eike-Henner W. Kluge - 1998 - In Helga Kuhse & Peter Singer (eds.), A Companion to Bioethics. Malden, Mass., USA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 274–285.
A case against justified non-voluntary active euthanasia (the groningen protocol).Alan Jotkowitz, S. Glick & B. Gesundheit - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (11):23 – 26.
Death or Disability? The 'Carmentis Machine' and Decision-Making for Critically Ill Children.Dominic Wilkinson - 2013 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-02-02
Downloads
6 (#1,694,901)
6 months
2 (#1,693,973)
2015-02-02
Downloads
6 (#1,694,901)
6 months
2 (#1,693,973)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Autonomy gone awry: A cross-cultural study of parents' experiences in neonatal intensive care units.Kristina Orfali & Elisa Gordon - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (4):329-365.
Limits of neonatal treatment: a survey of attitudes in the Danish population.M. Norup - 1998 - Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (3):200-206.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-qfrlh dc2