Ethical and Methodological Considerations for The Clinician-Scientist: a Call for Reflexivity

Clinical Ethics 17 (4):352-357 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Clinician-scientists play a valuable role in bridging the gap between patient care and clinical research. However, there are no clear guidelines that describe how to handle the day-to-day ethical and methodological questions that arise when navigating the competing responsibilities of practitioner and researcher—a situation that can easily leave the clinician-scientist confused and frustrated. This article outlines common ethical and methodological concerns for the clinician-scientist when developing, implementing, and analyzing research in practice, and offers practical suggestions to address these issues. This paper will outline the role that reflexivity can play throughout the research process to assist the clinician-scientist in maintaining ethical and methodological rigor, as well as upholding the moral obligations of both practitioner and researcher.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,516

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Beecher as Clinical Investigator: Pain and the Placebo Effect.Fabrizio Benedetti - 2016 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 59 (1):37-45.
The clinical investigator-subject relationship: a contextual approach.David B. Resnik - 2009 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 4:16-.
The Child with Cancer: Blurring the Lines Between Research and Treatment.M. Kruger & N. Nortjé - 2021 - In Nico Nortjé & Johan C. Bester (eds.), Pediatric Ethics: Theory and Practice. Springer Verlag. pp. 379-386.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-11-04

Downloads
20 (#1,031,500)

6 months
7 (#684,641)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?