Just Evidence: The Limits of Science in the Legal Process

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (2):328-341 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Both opponents and proponents of the death penalty express faith in science and in DNA evidence to justify their positions. This article examines the production of forensic evidence as a social activity and suggests that tendencies toward bias and error may not apply symmetrically in inculpation and exoneration contexts

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Just Evidence: The Limits of Science in the Legal Process.Sheila Jasanoff - 2006 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (2):328-341.
Forensic DNA Typing.David Wasserman - 2002 - In Justine Burley & John Harris (eds.), A Companion to Genethics. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 349–363.
Science, truth, and forensic cultures: The exceptional legal status of DNA evidence.Michael Lynch - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (1):60-70.
Forensic Science Identification Evidence.Sarah Lucy Cooper - 2016 - Journal of Philosophy, Science and Law 16:1-35.
On Evidence, Medical and Legal.Donald W. Miller & Clifford Miller - 2005 - Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons 10 (3):70-75.
The Impact of DNA Exonerations on the Criminal Justice System.Margaret A. Berger - 2006 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (2):320-327.
The Law-Set: The Legal-Scientific Production of Medical Propriety.Gary Edmond - 2001 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 26 (2):191-226.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-30

Downloads
96 (#218,967)

6 months
8 (#575,465)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?