- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The logical way of being true: Truth values and the ontological foundation of logic
Logic and Logical Philosophy 23 (2):119-131 (2014)
Abstract
In this paper I reject the normative interpretation of logic and give reasons for a realistic account based on the ontological treatment of logical valuesAuthor's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Is logic a normative science and how could it be normative?Iryna Khomenko & Yaroslav Sramko - 2019 - Filosofska Dumka (Philosophical Thought) 5:52-63.
Yaroslav Shramko and Heinrich Wansing, Truth and Falsehood - An Inquiry into Generalized Logical Values.Jean-Yves Beziau - 2014 - Studia Logica 102 (5):1079-1085.
Logical Determinacy versus Logical Contingency. The Case of Łukasiewicz’s Three-valued Logic.Andrew Schumann - 2019 - Studia Humana 8 (2):8-15.
An Approach to Uncertainty via Sets of Truth Values.George Gargov - 1995 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 36 (2):235-268.
Relevant generalization starts here (and here = 2).Dmitry Zaitsev & Oleg Grigoriev - 2010 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 19 (4):329-340.
Truth and Falsehood: An Inquiry Into Generalized Logical Values.Yaroslav Shramko & Heinrich Wansing - 2011 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.
Logic for Alethic, Logical, and Ontological Pluralists.Andy Yu - 2018 - In Jeremy Wyatt, Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen & Nathan Kellen (eds.), Pluralisms in Truth and Logic. Cham, Switzerland and Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 407-427.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-11-24
Downloads
72 (#291,282)
6 months
20 (#145,906)
2013-11-24
Downloads
72 (#291,282)
6 months
20 (#145,906)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
One Heresy and One Orthodoxy: On Dialetheism, Dimathematism, and the Non-normativity of Logic.Heinrich Wansing - 2024 - Erkenntnis 89 (1):181-205.
The Nature of Scientific Philosophy.Yaroslav Shramko - forthcoming - Logic and Logical Philosophy:1.
Is logic a normative science and how could it be normative?Iryna Khomenko & Yaroslav Sramko - 2019 - Filosofska Dumka (Philosophical Thought) 5:52-63.
References found in this work
Uber Sinn und Bedeutung.Gottlob Frege - 1892 - Zeitschrift für Philosophie Und Philosophische Kritik 100 (1):25-50.
On a three-valued logical calculus and its application to the analysis of the paradoxes of the classical extended functional calculus.D. A. Bochvar & Merrie Bergmann - 1981 - History and Philosophy of Logic 2 (1-2):87-112.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-lv8mh dc2