- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Reply to Recker’s “Imagination and Images in Descartes’ Science”
Southwest Philosophy Review 19 (2):61-64 (2003)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
A reply to Sievert concerning ethics in witigenstein’s early philosophy.Gary W. Levvis - 1994 - Southwest Philosophy Review 10 (2):179-184.
Images and Imagination in Descartes’Science.Doran A. Recker - 2003 - Southwest Philosophy Review 19 (1):41-50.
“The Darwinian Revolution in American Common-Sense and Science,” a Reply to Randall Auxier.Larry Hickman - 1993 - Southwest Philosophy Review 9 (2):105-109.
Analytics
Added to PP
2011-01-09
Downloads
26 (#857,659)
6 months
5 (#1,056,575)
2011-01-09
Downloads
26 (#857,659)
6 months
5 (#1,056,575)
Historical graph of downloads
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-wmc4m dc2