Self-Determination and the Metaphysics of Human Nature in Aristotle and Mencius

In Yang Xiao & Kim-Chong Chong, Dao Companion to the Philosophy of Mencius. Springer. pp. 635-649 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

If self-determination enables one to know truths and rule oneself, then it’s central to metaphysics and ethics because metaphysics concerns truths, and ethics grasps good actions requiring self-rule. Aristotle and Mencius agree about the relation between metaphysics and ethics. Nevertheless, closer examination shows differences in their conceptions of the self, how it knows truths, the nature of truth, and the effectiveness of the wise/virtuous on the world. Given the significance of self-determination to theory and practice, comparing Mencius’s and Aristotle’s views illuminates it and the challenges for each author’s view.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,467

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-05-16

Downloads
18 (#1,204,393)

6 months
7 (#609,087)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

May Sim
College of the Holy Cross

Citations of this work

The Communication Philosophy Model (15th edition).Felisianus Efrem Jelahut - 2024 - Lumen Veritatis: Jurnal Filsafat Dan Teologi 15 (02):213-222. Translated by Efrem Jelahut.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references