The Conversational Character of Oppression

Australasian Philosophical Review 5 (2):160-169 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

McGowan argues that everyday verbal bigotry makes a key contribution to the harms of discriminatory inequality, via a mechanism that she calls sneaky norm enactment. Part of her account involves showing that the characteristic of conversational interaction that facilitates sneaky norm enactment is in fact a generic one, which obtains in a wide range of activities, namely, the property of having conventions of appropriateness. I argue that her account will be better-able to show that everyday verbal bigotry is a key factor in social inequality if it tries to isolate a more specific property of conversation as the thing that facilitates sneaky norm enactment.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-05-27

Downloads
615 (#49,050)

6 months
124 (#50,766)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Mark Simpson
University College London

Citations of this work

Bending as Counterspeech.Laura Caponetto & Bianca Cepollaro - 2023 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 26 (4):577-593.
Response to Critics.Mary Kate McGowan - 2021 - Australasian Philosophical Review 5 (2):211-220.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Philosophical investigations.Ludwig Wittgenstein & G. E. M. Anscombe - 1953 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 161:124-124.
Scorekeeping in a language game.David Lewis - 1979 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1):339--359.
Must we mean what we say?Stanley Cavell - 1969 - New York,: Scribner.
Blocking as Counter-Speech.Rae Langton - 2018 - In Daniel Fogal, Daniel W. Harris & Matt Moss, New Work on Speech Acts. Oxford University Press. pp. 144–164.

View all 9 references / Add more references