The Moral Self in Confucius and Aristotle

International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (4):439-462 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

My purpose is to argue the following theses: (1) Habituation into virtue, social relations, and paradigmatic persons are central for both Aristotle and Confucius. Both therefore need a notion of self to support them. (2) Aristotle’s individualistic metaphysics cannot account for the thick relations that this requires. (3) The Confucian self, if entirely relationistic, cannot function as a locus of choice and agency; if fully ritualistic, it cannot function as a source of moral norms that might help assess existing social proprieties. I shall suggest that each offers some corrective for the other and urge further dialogue between the friends of Confucius and Aristotle.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
74 (#284,937)

6 months
9 (#502,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

May Sim
College of the Holy Cross

Citations of this work

Virtuous Decision Making for Business Ethics.Chris Provis - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 91 (S1):3 - 16.
Harmony and the mean in theNicomachean Ethics and theZhongyong.May Sim - 2004 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 3 (2):253-280.
Aristotle's Politics Today.Lenn Evan Goodman & Robert B. Talisse (eds.) - 2007 - State University of New York Press.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references