Fiduciary Paradox and Psychotherapy

Philosophy in the Contemporary World 10 (1):69-74 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the psychotherapist-patient relationship, the therapist-fiduciary must deal with ambiguity, assume risks, and make decisions without final appeal to psychiatric theory. Ambiguity regarding patient autonomy poses treatment paradoxes. Caregiving that aims at autonomy can end up undermining it. Additionally, pursuit of autonomy can put the patient’s well-being at risk.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,072

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Fiduciary Paradox and Psychotherapy.Dennis E. Skocz - 2003 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 10 (1):69-74.
The student with a writing block--the ethics of psychotherapy.Sidney Bloch - 1989 - Journal of Medical Ethics 15 (3):153-158.
Autonomy Gone Mad.Alfred I. Tauber - 2003 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 10 (1):75-80.
Trust, Autonomy, and the Fiduciary Relationship.Carolyn McLeod & Emma Ryman - 2020 - In Paul B. Miller & Matthew Harding (eds.), Fiduciaries and Trust: Ethics, Politics, Economics and Law. Cambridge University Press. pp. 74-86.
Patient autonomy in emergency medicine.Anne-Cathrine Naess, Reidun Foerde & Petter Andreas Steen - 2001 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (1):71-77.
Deciding for the Incompetent.Eric Vogelstein - 2016 - In John K. Davis (ed.), Ethics at the End of Life: New Issues and Arguments. New York: Routledge. pp. 108-125.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
49 (#448,521)

6 months
10 (#411,161)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references