Being beyond: The Black Legend and how we got over it

History of Science 55 (2):148-166 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We used to think it was the job of a historian of Spanish science to combat the negative evaluations of Hispanic cultures that came to be known as the Black Legend. Paradoxically, attempts to amend dominant narratives of the history of science (such as the Scientific Revolution) so that they might accommodate Spain bolstered the very stories we meant to dismantle. Caring about the Black Legend deformed the history we were trying to write and never convinced the people we hoped to sway. In this article, we provide an overview of the historiographic tendencies that most shaped our careers – responses to the Black Legend, such as contributionist history and bibliometrics – and explain why we have chosen to move on.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,072

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rereading the Black Legend: The Discourse of Religious and Racial Difference in the Renaissance Empires. [REVIEW]Lisa Vollendorf - 2009 - Clio: A Journal of Literature, History, and the Philosophy of History 38 (2):197-200.
Interprefactions: Freud's legendary science.Mikkel Borch-Jacobsen & Sonu Shamdasani - 2008 - History of the Human Sciences 21 (3):1-25.
Why did we think we dreamed in black and white?Eric Schwitzgebel - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (4):649-660.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-04

Downloads
27 (#826,915)

6 months
7 (#711,641)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references