Philosophical Reflexivity in Psychological Science: Do We Have It? Does It Matter?

In Kieran C. O'Doherty, Lisa M. Osbeck, Ernst Schraube & Jeffery Yen (eds.), Psychological Studies of Science and Technology. Springer Verlag. pp. 237-256 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Reflexivity is a prominent theme in much science and technology studies scholarship. Yet, within most of conventional psychological science, there has been little awareness of either the concept of reflexivity or the various tools that researchers might employ in critically reflexive examinations of the research they are engaged in. However, reflexivity is a complex concept, and despite its esteemed status within qualitative research traditions, reflexivity has been somewhat of a contentious topic within the broader domain of STS. In this chapter, the multilayered concept of reflexivity is delineated and the various positions on the benefits and drawbacks of reflexivity in social research are discussed. We then examine reflexivity in relation to psychological science, and explore the question of whether philosophical reflexivity, as a specific type of reflexive practice, might play a generative role in psychological science.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,793

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Examining the psychology of practitioners, institutions and structures.Joanne Hunt - 2022 - Outlines. Critical Practice Studies 23 (1):06-49.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-03-12

Downloads
9 (#1,551,777)

6 months
6 (#812,813)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references