- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Seeing is not (necessarily) believing
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):130-130 (1998)
Abstract
We doubt that theory of mind can be sufficiently demonstrated without reliance on verbal tests. Where language is the major tool of social manipulation, an effective theory of mind must use language as an input. We suspect, therefore, that in this context, prelinguistic human and nonhuman minds are more alike than are human pre- and postlinguistic minds.Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
- From the Publisher via CrossRef (no proxy)
- espace.library.uq.edu.au
(no proxy) - journals.cambridge.org (no proxy)
- journals.cambridge.org [2] (no proxy)
- journals.cambridge.org [3] (no proxy)
- journals.cambridge.org [4] (no proxy)
- journals.cambridge.org [5] (no proxy)
- journals.cambridge.org [6] (no proxy)
- cambridge.org (no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Darwin's mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds.Derek C. Penn, Keith J. Holyoak & Daniel J. Povinelli - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (2):109-130.
How we know our minds: The illusion of first-person knowledge of intentionality.Alison Gopnik - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (1):1-14.
Does the normal brain have a theory of mind?Valerie E. Stone & Philip Gerrans - 2006 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 (1):3-4.
Mathematical constraints on a theory of human memory - Response.S. Dennis, M. S. Humphreys & J. Wiles - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (3):559-560.
Language and its role in understanding intentional relations: Research tool or mechanism of development?Nancy Budwig & Michael Bamberg - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (1):125-126.
RETRACTED ARTICLE: The impact of advertising on social processes.Olga Pavlovskaya, Daria Kurenova, Gulsina Murtazina & Olga Kolosova - 2023 - Mind and Society 22 (1):159-159.
Preface: Evolutionary theory in cognitive psychology. [REVIEW]Paul Sheldon Davies - 1996 - Minds and Machines 6 (4):445-462.
The hominid tool-language connection: Some missing evolutionary links?A. Maryanski - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (1):199-200.
Human language: Are nonhuman precursors lacking?Marc D. Hauser & Nathan D. Wolfea - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (1):190-191.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
43 (#518,702)
6 months
17 (#173,529)
2009-01-28
Downloads
43 (#518,702)
6 months
17 (#173,529)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Psycho-practice, psycho-theory and the contrastive case of autism: How practices of mind become second-nature.Victoria McGeer - 2001 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 8 (5-7):109-132.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-sfdq8 dc2