Activity as an Anthropological Category: (On Distinguishing the Ontological and Epistemological Status of Activity)

Russian Studies in Philosophy 40 (2):31-43 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In contemporary human sciences, the concept of activity continues to play a key, methodologically central role, since it is used in attempts to give a universal characterization of either the whole human world or the inner world of a concrete individual . In either case, the category of activity is elevated to the level of a universal, ultimate abstraction, which, in E.G. Iudin's words, "combines empirical certainty with theoretical depth and methodological constructiveness" [11, p. 249]

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Actions and activity.Jennifer Hornsby - 2012 - Philosophical Issues 22 (1):233-245.
The Ideal, Creative Activity, and Human Development.Alexander A. Sorokin - 2010 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 48 (4):76-91.
The Philosophy of Activity.David Bakhurst - 1997 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 36 (1):47-56.
Ideals.E. Il'enkov, V. Murian & S. Ikonnikova - 1965 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 4 (1):35-51.
Bildung in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit.Marina F. Bykova - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 20:17-25.
Time in Relation to the Concept of Reflection.R. I. Kruglikov - 1984 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 22 (4):34-53.
Hierarchy of goals and values: limits of self-organization.I. Mielkov - 2012 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 4 (22):118-125.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-08-27

Downloads
105 (#203,177)

6 months
5 (#1,062,008)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations