Why some machines may need qualia and how they can have them (Including a demanding new Turing test for robot philosophers.)

Abstract

Many debates about consciousness appear to be endless, in part because of conceptual confusions preventing clarity as to what the issues are and what does or does not count as evidence. This makes it hard to decide what should go into a machine if it is to be described as 'conscious'. Thus, triumphant demonstrations by some AI developers may be regarded by others as proving nothing of interest because the system does not satisfy *their* definitions or requirements specifications.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,314

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Can a machine be conscious? How?Stevan Harnad - 2003 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 10 (4-5):67-75.
Turing's two tests for intelligence.Susan G. Sterrett - 1999 - Minds and Machines 10 (4):541-559.
Beyond Turing equivalence.Aaron Sloman - 1996 - In Peter Millican & Andy Clark, Machines and Thought: The Legacy of Alan Turing. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. pp. 1--179.
The Temptation of Absolute Truth.Julius Kovesi - 1962 - Twentieth Century 16:216-222.
Which kind of machine consciousness?Roberto Cordeschi - 2010 - International Journal of Machine Consciousness 2 (1):31-33.
CRITICAL REVIEW: Engineering Philosophy. [REVIEW]Catherine Legg - 2010 - International Journal of Machine Consciousness 2 (1):45-50.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
147 (#157,737)

6 months
15 (#168,777)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?