Was homo erectus an ecological dominant species?

In John R. F. Bower & S. Sartono (eds.), Evolution and Ecology of Homo erectus. Pithecanthropus Centennial Foundation. pp. 169-176 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Richard Alexander explains human uniqueness by postulating that at some point an ancestral species became 'ecological dominant' and the external forces of natural selection were replaced by within-species, intergroup competition. It is argued that this transition probably took place in archaic Homo sapiens (Homo heidelbergensis) and not in Homo erectus. Homo erectus was an ecological very flexible species, however.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,497

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Plio-pleistocene Hominids: Epistemological and Taxonomic Problems.Jolanta Koszteyn - 1970 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 9 (1):169-199.
Plio-pleistocene Hominids: Epistemological and Taxonomic Problems.Jolanta Koszteyn - 1970 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 9 (1):169-202.
Human evolution.Bernard Wood - 1996 - Bioessays 18 (12):945-954.
Evolution and Ecology of Homo erectus.John R. F. Bower & S. Sartono (eds.) - 1995 - Pithecanthropus Centennial Foundation.
Recritude: Reflections on Postural Ontology.Adriana Cavarero - 2013 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 27 (3):220-235.
Since when have humans had a soul?Andreas May - 2022 - HTS Theological Studies 78 (2).

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-22

Downloads
10 (#1,464,485)

6 months
10 (#377,653)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Pouwel Slurink
Radboud University (PhD)

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references