Quine's philosophy of science

Synthese 19 (1-2):3 - 13 (1968)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article is mainly concerned to summarise a fairly well articulated position on the philosophy of science which may be extracted from scattered passages in quine's "word and object." (1) there is no sharp line between philosophy and science, Or between science and mathematics, Or between science and common sense. (2) abstract mathematical entities are theoretical posits just as electrons are. (3) epistemology is a branch of biology. (4) quine's earlier instrumentalism has given way to a scientific realism. (5) quine's philosophy of space-Time is briefly discussed. (6) an extensional language is adequate for science

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,063

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Scientific Realism and Anti-realism in Quine’s Philosophy.Amir Hajizadeh - 2021 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations 15 (37):974-996.
Extensionalism and Scientific Theory in Quine’s Philosophy.Saloua Chatti - 2011 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (1):1-21.
A Dogma of Naturalism.Nathan Sinclair - 2012 - Metaphilosophy 43 (5):551-566.
Quine's Argument from Despair.Sander Verhaegh - 2014 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (1):150-173.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
70 (#296,695)

6 months
10 (#379,980)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Quine on natural kinds.Hugh T. Wilder - 1972 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 50 (3):263 – 270.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Reply to professor Marcus.W. V. Quine - 1961 - Synthese 13 (4):323 - 330.

Add more references