- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
A new defense of Quinn's principle of double effect
Journal of Social Philosophy 38 (2):349–364 (2007)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Intention, foreseeability, and responsibility.Gerald Dworkin - 1987 - In Ferdinand David Schoeman (ed.), Responsibility, Character, and the Emotions: New Essays in Moral Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 338--354.
The Principle of Double Effect: A History and Philosophical Defense.David Černý - 2020 - New York: Routledge.
Four versions of double effect.Donald B. Marquis - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):515-544.
Intention, Character, and Double Effect.Lawrence J. Masek - 2018 - Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.
The Paradox of Self-Defense: Saving Oneself by Harming Another.Whitley R. P. Kaufman - 2009 - Lexington Books.
Revising the Doctrine of Double Effect.Jeff McMahan - 1994 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 11 (2):201-212.
Intending, Foreseeing and the Doctrine of Double Effect.Ann Bumpus - 1995 - Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
51 (#425,300)
6 months
8 (#569,389)
2009-01-28
Downloads
51 (#425,300)
6 months
8 (#569,389)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Three Cheers for Double Effect.Dana Kay Nelkin & Samuel C. Rickless - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89 (1):125-158.
So Close, Yet So Far: Why Solutions to the Closeness Problem for the Doctrine of Double Effect Fall Short.Dana Kay Nelkin & Samuel C. Rickless - 2013 - Noûs 49 (2):376-409.
The Secret to the Success of the Doctrine of Double Effect : Biased Framing, Inadequate Methodology, and Clever Distractions.Uwe Steinhoff - 2018 - The Journal of Ethics 22 (3-4):235-263.
References found in this work
Actions, Intentions, and Consequences: The Doctrine of Double Effect.Warren S. Quinn - 1989 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 18 (4):334-351.
The Doctrine of Double Effect: Problems of Interpretation.Nancy Davis - 2017 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 65 (2):107-123.
Toward understanding the principle of double effect.Joseph M. Boyle Jr - 1980 - Ethics 90 (4):527-538.
Quinn on double effect: The problem of "closeness".John Martin Fischer, Mark Ravizza & David Copp - 1993 - Ethics 103 (4):707-725.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-2pm92 dc2