Making sense of the right side of history

Think 21 (62):103-115 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article explores arguments from ‘the right side of history’. These arguments are often interpreted as making an appeal to a trajectory which independently guides history. These arguments are often criticized on the grounds that history simply doesn't work that way. I offer an interpretation of right side of history arguments that does not rely on this sort of historical trajectory, and argue that even this version of the argument fails.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 105,375

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-09-20

Downloads
25 (#971,915)

6 months
6 (#728,674)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nicholas Smith
Alabama A&M

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

How Skeptical is the Equal Weight View?Jonathan Matheson & Brandon Carey - 2012 - In Diego E. Machuca, Disagreement and skepticism. New York: Routledge. pp. 131-149.

Add more references