The Wartenberg-Smith Film as Philosophy Debate: A Response to Diana Neiva

American Society for Aesthetics Graduate E-Journal 11 (1):1-6 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,774

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Wartenberg-Smith Film as Philosophy Debate: Review of Current Controversies in Philosophy of Film. [REVIEW]Diana Neiva - 2019 - American Society for Aesthetics Graduate E-Journal 11 (1):1-13.
Introduction.Murray Smith & Thomas E. Wartenberg - 2006 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (1):1-9.
Murray Smith (2017) Film, Art, and the Third Culture: A Naturalized Aesthetics of Film.Will Kitchen - 2021 - Film-Philosophy 25 (1):83-86.
Murray Smith. Film, Art, and the Third Culture: A Naturalized Aesthetics of Film. Reviewed by. [REVIEW]Iris Vidmar - 2018 - Philosophy in Review 38 (3):123-125.
Film spectatorship: A reply to Murray Smith.Richard Allen - 1998 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 56 (1):61-63.
Smith, Murray. 2017. Film, Art, and the Third Culture: A Naturalized Aesthetics of Film. [REVIEW]David Andrews - 2018 - Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture 2 (1):133-136.
Analytic Philosophy and Film: On Film Theory and Philosophy , edited by Richard Allen and Murray Smith.Samuel Guttenplan - 1998 - Film-Philosophy 2 (1).
Collaboration in the Third Culture.Stacie Friend - 2018 - Projections: The Journal for Movies and Mind 12 (2):39-49.
Christina Rawls, Diana Neiva, and Steven S. Gouveia (eds.) (2019) Philosophy and Film: Bridging Divides.Eddy Troy - 2021 - Film-Philosophy 25 (3):390-392.
SMITH, MURRAY. Film, Art, and the Third Culture: A Naturalized Aesthetics of Film. Oxford University Press, 2017, xiii + 294 pp., 32 b&w illust., $45.00 cloth. [REVIEW]Katherine Thomson-Jones - 2018 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 76 (3):356-359.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-01-10

Downloads
2 (#1,951,855)

6 months
2 (#1,735,400)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Murray Smith
University of Kent

Citations of this work

Are There Definite Objections to Film as Philosophy? Metaphilosophical Considerations.Diana Neiva - 2019 - In Christina Rawls, Diana Neiva & Steven S. Gouveia (eds.), Philosophy and Film: Bridging Divides. New York: Routledge Press, Research on Aesthetics. pp. 116-134.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references