Experience and necessity: The mill-Whewell debate

In James Robert Brown (ed.), Philosophy of Science: The Key Thinkers. New York: Continuum Books. pp. 10 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,174

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Laura J. Snyder, Reforming Philosophy: A Victorian Debate on Science and Society. [REVIEW]John P. McCaskey - 2008 - The Objective Standard 2008:107–109.
Laura Snyder, Reforming philosophy. [REVIEW]Sergio Volodia Marcello Cremaschi - 2009 - Rivista di Filosofia 100 (2):324-325.
Laura J. Snyder, Reforming Philosophy: A Victorian Debate on Science and Society. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2006. Pp. x+386. ISBN 0-226-76733-7. $45.00, £23.50. [REVIEW]Thomas Dixon - 2008 - British Journal for the History of Science 41 (3):462-464.
History of Science a la Belle Lettre: a Case of Laura Snyder. [REVIEW]И.Т Касавин - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 48 (2):233-237.
History of Science a la Belle Lettre: a Case of Laura Snyder. [REVIEW]Ilya Kasavin - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 48 (2):233-237.
Reforming Philosophy: A Victorian Debate on Science and Society.Laura J. Snyder - 2006 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Inference to the best explanation: Or, who won the Mill-Whewell debate?Peter Achinstein - 1992 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 23 (2):349-364.
The Whewell-Mill debate on predictions, from Mill's point of view.Cornelis Menke - 2018 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 69:60-71.
Laura J. Snyder.is Evidence Historical - 1994 - In Peter Achinstein & Laura J. Snyder (eds.), Scientific methods: conceptual and historical problems. Malabar, Fla.: Krieger Pub. Co..
History and scientific practice in the construction of an adequate philosophy of science: revisiting a Whewell/Mill debate.Aaron D. Cobb - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (1):85-93.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-30

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Laura J. Snyder
Johns Hopkins University (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references