Revisiting the myth: Husserl and Sellars on the given

Review of Metaphysics 57 (2):301-337 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

IN SCIENCE, PERCEPTION, AND REALITY, Sellars marvels at the power of fashion in philosophy, which all too often offers us the spectacle of a stampede rather than a careful sifting of gold from dross. Sellars was worried that the flight from phenomenalism would lead to the familiar pendulum effect and so thwart his effort to “usher analytic philosophy out of its Humean and into its Kantian stage,” as Rorty has put it. Accordingly, Sellars’s critique of the Myth of the Given aimed to show that what was really wrong with phenomenalism was nothing particular to the sense-data of the positivists but the framework of givenness itself.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,063

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sellars vs. the given.Daniel Bonevac - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (1):1-30.
Sellars and the "myth of the given".William P. Alston - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (1):69-86.
Givenness and Primal Confusion.Jay Garfield - 2018 - In Jay L. Garfield (ed.), Wilfrid Sellars and Buddhist Philosophy: Freedom From Foundations. New York, USA: Routledge. pp. 113-129.
Discursive and Somatic Intentionality: Merleau-Ponty Contra 'McDowell or Sellars'.Carl B. Sachs - 2014 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 22 (2):199-227.
Truth, Nature, and Sellars's Myth of the Given.Lawrence Cahoone - 2020 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 34 (4):463-477.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
276 (#96,687)

6 months
8 (#549,811)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references