A priori and the Philosophy of Science [Book Review]

Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 49 (3):225-231 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The new book by Professor David J. Stump explores and develops the theories of the a priori, which are rarely considered in contemporary epistemology and philosophy of science: the theories of pragmatic and functional a priori, proposed in the early XX century by Clarence Irving Lewis and Arthur Pap. The author begins with the analysis of «constitutive elements of science» and Henri Poincare's conventionalism. He consistently and historically examines the approaches towards the theories of the a priori within the philosophy of science in the XX-XXI centuries, and also develops his own original approach to a priori based on the philosophy of science.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,561

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Priori in the Philosophy of Science.Tatiana D. Sokolova - 2020 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 57 (3):60-74.
Realism, functions, and the a priori: Ernst Cassirer's philosophy of science.Jeremy Heis - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 48:10-19.
Arthur Pap’s Functional Theory of the A Priori.David J. Stump - 2011 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 1 (2):273-290.
Conventionalism, structuralism and neo-Kantianism in Poincaré’s philosophy of science.Milena Ivanova - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 52 (Part B):114-122.
A Priori in the Classical Model of Science.Tatiana D. Sokolova - 2022 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 59 (1):81-93.
Прагматическая концепция a priori.Кларенс Ирвинг Льюис - 2014 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 42 (4):222-231.
On Gnoseological and Ontological Meaning of Thought Experiment.Igor Nevvazhay - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 49 (3):28-35.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-15

Downloads
39 (#555,810)

6 months
14 (#206,617)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tatiana Sokolova
Russian Academy of Sciences

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references