Neprirodzená prirodzenosť

Espes 1 (1):2-8 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The background of the author’s thoughts is a radical critique of art and science by J. J. Rousseau and genuine aesthetic and moral disposition of a human being outlined by I. Kant in his pre-critic works. According to the author, the art of twentieth century reveals problems of a “nature of a contemporary man”. The author illustrates possible consequences of Rousseau’s critique of an art and science in the present and the shifts of natural aesthetic dispositions, as named by Kant in the contemporary art.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Estetika v divadle.Jana Sošková - 2013 - Espes 2 (2):1-8.
Kant, Celmins and Art after the End of Art.Sandra Shapshay - 2020 - Con-Textos Kantianos 1 (12):209-225.
Danto and Kant.Diarmuid Costello - 1993 - In Mark Rollins (ed.), Danto and His Critics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 153–171.
Warum Kant ein ästhetischer Kognitivist der schönen Kunst ist.Fridolin Neumann - 2023 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 77 (1):74-96.
Art and Aesthetics in Human Life: An Interview with Jana Sošková.Lenka Bandurová - 2021 - Espes. The Slovak Journal of Aesthetics 10 (1):90-95.
The Inclusive Interpretation of Kant's Aesthetic Ideas.Samantha Matherne - 2013 - British Journal of Aesthetics 53 (1):21-39.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-02-28

Downloads
9 (#1,523,857)

6 months
2 (#1,685,182)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations