Replies [to Stanley Aronowitz]

Abstract

But let me not beat a dead horse: Social Text is not my enemy, nor is it my main intellectual target. More interesting are the substantive philosophical and political issues raised in Professor Aronowitz's critique of my Afterword. Unfortunately, Aronowitz seems to have had difficulty in reading my plain words.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,518

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Reply to commentaries.Evan Thompson - 2011 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 18 (5-6):5-6.
Replies to Gallois, Hirsch and Markosian. [REVIEW]Theodore Sider - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (3):674–687.
Author's Response: On Machines and Natural Drifts.Jorge Mpodozis - 2022 - Constructivist Foundations 18 (1):115-118.
Cosmopolitanism and the Circle of Reason.Pratap Bhanu Mehta - 2000 - Political Theory 28 (5):619-639.
Schmitt and Marcuse: Friends, Force, and Quality.J. Diaz - 2013 - Télos 2013 (165):137-150.
Intrinsic and extrinsic properties.Ross P. Cameron - 2009 - In Robin Le Poidevin, Simons Peter, McGonigal Andrew & Ross P. Cameron (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Metaphysics. New York: Routledge.
A Memoir of My Reading.Bennett Gilbert - 2024 - On_Culture 16 (16).

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
19 (#1,088,569)

6 months
19 (#158,749)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alan Sokal
American University in Cairo

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references