Against Robustness? Strategies to Support the Reliability of Scientific Results

International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 28 (2):203-215 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/02698595.2014.932530

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,343

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Robustness, solidity, and multiple determinations: Léna Soler, Emiliano Trizio, Thomas Nickles and William Wimsatt (eds): Characterizing the robustness of science: After the practice turn in philosophy of science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol. 292. Dordrecht: Springer, 2012, 372pp, €149.75 HB. [REVIEW]Klodian Coko & Jutta Schickore - 2013 - Metascience 22 (3):681-683.
Review of Léna Soler, Emiliano Trizio, and Andrew Pickering, eds. Science as It Could Have Been. Discussing the Contingency/Inevitability Problem. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press, 2016. [REVIEW]Katherina Kinzel - 2016 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 6 (2):319-323.
Some Reflections on Experimental Incommensurability.Howard Sankey - 2008 - In Lena Soler, Howard Sankey & Paul Hoyningen-Huene, Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison: Stabilities, Ruptures, Incommensurabilities? Springer. pp. 341-347.
The practice turn and its effect on science studies: Léna Soler, Sjoerd Zwart, Michael Lynch and Vincent Israel : Science after the practice turn in the philosophy, history, and social studies of science. New York and London: Routledge and Taylor Group, 2014, 354pp, $145.00 HB.Juan M. Durán - 2016 - Metascience 25 (2):285-288.
Other histories, other sciences.Kidd Ian James - 2017 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 61:57-60.
The appeal to robustness in measurement practice.Alessandra Basso - 2017 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 65-66 (C):57-66.
Multiple means of determination and mutiple constraints of construction: robustness and strategies for modeling macromolecular objects.Frédéric Wieber - 2012 - In Lena Soler, Characterizing the robustness of science: after the practice turn in philosophy of science. New York: Springer Verlag. pp. 267-288.
Léna Soler, Emiliano Trizio and Andrew Pickering , Science as It Could Have Been: Discussing the Contingency/Inevitability Problem. Pittsburgh: The University of Pittsburgh Press, 2015. Pp. 462. ISBN 978-0-8229-4445-4. $61.95. [REVIEW]Alex Aylward - 2017 - British Journal for the History of Science 50 (2):379-381.
Securing scientific evidence.Kent Staley - unknown
Two Senses of Experimental Robustness: Result Robustness and Procedure Robustness.Koray Karaca - 2022 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 73 (1):279-298.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-09-12

Downloads
99 (#219,844)

6 months
9 (#328,796)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Robustness and reality.Markus I. Eronen - 2015 - Synthese 192 (12):3961-3977.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Experiment in Physics.Allan Franklin - 2012 - In Ed Zalta, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more references