- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Commentary on Alison Gopnik's "the scientist as child"
Philosophy of Science 63 (4):547-551 (1996)
Abstract
NoneAuthor's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Commentary on Alison Gopnik's''the scientist as child''-Reply.Alison Gopnik - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (4):552-561.
Making Medical Knowledge. Review of: Making Medical Knowledge by Solomon, Miriam. [REVIEW]Michael Edward Wilde - 2017 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Reviews.
Miriam Solomon, Social Empiricism. [REVIEW]Catherine Hundleby - 2003 - Philosophy in Review 23:404-407.
Miriam Solomon, Social Empiricism Reviewed by.Catherine Hundleby - 2003 - Philosophy in Review 23 (6):404-407.
Social empiricism by Miriam Solomon Bradford Books/MIT press, 2001. Pp. 175 + XI £21.95.John Dupré - 2003 - Philosophy 78 (1):123-145.
Learning as a Child in Gopnik’s The Philosophical Baby.Christopher Joseph An - 2017 - Budhi: A Journal of Ideas and Culture 21 (3):82-96.
The baby in the lab-coat: Why child development is not an adequate model for understanding the development of science.Daniel Nazer, Aaron Ruby, Shaun Nichols, Jonathan Weinberg, Stephen Stich, Luc Faucher & Ron Mallon - 2002 - In Peter Carruthers, Stephen P. Stich & Michael Siegal, The Cognitive Basis of Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Social Empiricism Miriam Solomon Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001, xi + 175 pp., $32.00. [REVIEW]Richmond Campbell - 2004 - Dialogue 43 (3):615-.
18 The baby in the lab-coat: why child development is not an adequate model for understanding the development of science.Luc Faucher, Ron Mallon, Daniel Nazer, Shaun Nichols, Aaron Ruby, Stephen Stich & Jonathan Weinberg - 2002 - In Peter Carruthers, Stephen P. Stich & Michael Siegal, The Cognitive Basis of Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
86 (#254,195)
6 months
14 (#195,031)
2009-01-28
Downloads
86 (#254,195)
6 months
14 (#195,031)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Can scientific development and children's cognitive development be the same process?Stephen M. Downes - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (4):565-578.
A Theory of Conceptual Advance: Explaining Conceptual Change in Evolutionary, Molecular, and Evolutionary Developmental Biology.Ingo Brigandt - 2006 - Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh
Science and common sense: perspectives from philosophy and science education.Sara Green - 2019 - Synthese 196 (3):795-818.
Cognitive individualism and the child as scientist program.Bill Wringe - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (4):518-529.
References found in this work
Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry.Helen E. Longino - 1990 - Princeton University Press.
A Confutation of Convergent Realism.Larry Laudan - 2001 - In Yuri Balashov & Alexander Rosenberg, Philosophy of Science: Contemporary Readings. New York: Routledge. pp. 211.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-8567d8d854-wzn75 dc2