Future law: Prepunishment and the causal theory of verdicts

Noûs 40 (1):166–183 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The poster boy for my paper is the King's Messenger in Lewis Carroll's Through the Looking Glass. Recall that since the White Queen lives backwards, her memory works forwards. She pities Alice who can only remember things after they happen. Alice asks which things the Queen remembers best: `Oh, things that happened the week after next,' the Queen replied in a careless tone. `For instance, . . . there's the King's Messenger. He's in prison now, being punished: and the trial doesn't even begin till next Wednesday: and of course the crime comes last of all.' (Chapter V) Is the King's Messenger being treated unjustly? Why not prepunish people for their future crimes? True, it is generally easier to have knowledge about past crimes than future crimes. But is unpredictability the only problem with prepunishment?

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.0029-4624.2006.00605.x

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,072

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Descartes through the Looking–Glass: Is it Possible to Believe What is Contradictory?*: WILLIAM F. LAWHEAD.William F. Lawhead - 1985 - Religious Studies 21 (2):169-179.
Imagining a new public information and communication infrastructure.Douglas Schuler - 2017 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 47 (1):24-31.
Faith and reason: A false antithesis?: Basil Mitchell.Basil Mitchell - 1980 - Religious Studies 16 (2):131-144.
Alice in Wonderland and Philosophy: Curiouser and Curiouser.William Irwin & Richard Brian Davis - 2009 - Wiley.
Unveiling Esther as a pragmatic radical rhetoric.Susan Zaeske - 2000 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 33 (3):193-220.
The locus of mathematical reality: An anthropological footnote.Leslie A. White - 1947 - Philosophy of Science 14 (4):289-303.
compatibilist Objections To Prepunishment.Ryan Lake - 2010 - Florida Philosophical Review 10 (1):7-15.
Should Retributivists Prefer Prepunishment?Patrick Tomlin - 2015 - Social Theory and Practice 41 (2):275-285.
Crimes against Future Generations: Implementing Intergenerational Justice through International Criminal Law.Sébastien Jodoin - 2010 - Intergenerational Justice Review 5 (1).
The time to punish and the problem of moral luck.Daniel Statman - 1997 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (2):129–136.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
131 (#168,058)

6 months
10 (#410,099)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Roy Sorensen
University of Texas at Austin

Citations of this work

Knowledge and Legal Proof.Sarah Moss - forthcoming - Oxford Studies in Epistemology.
The Real-Life Issue of Prepunishment.Preston Greene - 2022 - Social Theory and Practice 48 (3):507-523.
The consequentialist problem with prepunishment.Preston Greene - 2021 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 10 (3):199-208.
Knowledge and merely predictive evidence.Haley Schilling Anderson - forthcoming - Philosophical Studies:1-19.
What's Wrong with Prepunishment?Alex Kaiserman - 2023 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 104 (3):622-645.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Thought.Gilbert Harman - 1973 - Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
Reasons and Persons.Joseph Margolis - 1984 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (2):311-327.
Moral thinking: its levels, method, and point.R. M. Hare (ed.) - 1981 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
A causal theory of knowing.Alvin I. Goldman - 1967 - Journal of Philosophy 64 (12):357-372.

View all 21 references / Add more references