Understanding films

The Philosophers' Magazine 56 (56):95-99 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What we are dealing with is the problem of underdetermination of information – there is not enough information to prove one hypothesis over the other. This is a common problem that comes up most often in the sciences. But while scientists have recourse to a variety of considerations that help them settle on a hypothesis, when interpreting films, the principle that is most helpful is the principle of charity.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Understanding films.Jason Southworth - 2012 - The Philosophers' Magazine 56 (56):95-99.
You’ve seen the films..Chris Darke - 2003 - The Philosophers' Magazine 21:57-57.
What is information quality?Luciano Floridi - 2013 - The Philosophers' Magazine 61:24-25.
Evidence and Confirmation.Colin Howson - 2000 - In W. Newton-Smith (ed.), A companion to the philosophy of science. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell. pp. 108–116.
Sinnott's Philosophy of Purpose.David L. Miller - 1958 - Review of Metaphysics 11 (4):637 - 647.
The Principle of Charity, Transcendentalism and Relativism.María Rosario Hernández Borges - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 6:69-75.
One at Most.Sarah Conly - 2016 - The Philosophers' Magazine 75:78-82.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-09-18

Downloads
50 (#435,788)

6 months
11 (#337,502)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references