Comments on “locality, Bell's theorem, and quantum mechanics”

Foundations of Physics 15 (9):973-976 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Two different ideas of locality are described. Both are due essentially to einstein. Quantum theory is compatible with the first but not the second. The problems encountered in the article cited in the title arise from trying to use only the first idea of locality, whereas Bell's-theorem considerations pertain to the second

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,343

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Philosophical Implications of Bell's Theorem.Niall Shanks - 1987 - Dissertation, University of Alberta (Canada)
Against 'Realism'.Travis Norsen - 2007 - Foundations of Physics 37 (3):311-340.
Quantum mechanics reality and separability.Franco Selleri & G. Tarozzi - 1981 - la Rivista Del Nuovo Cimento 4 (2):1-53.
Locality and Bell's Theorem.W. De Baere, A. Mann & M. Revzen - 1999 - Foundations of Physics 29 (1):67-77.
Classicality and Bell’s theorem.Márton Gömöri & Carl Hoefer - 2023 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 13 (3):1-24.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-09

Downloads
103 (#211,788)

6 months
20 (#136,238)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Physics and philosophy: the revolution in modern science.Werner Heisenberg - 1958 - Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books. Edited by Ruth Nanda Anshen.

Add more references