Dynamic Encoding in a Simple Autogenic System

Biosemiotics 14 (3):583-587 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

How did molecules become signs? First, according to Deacon, there had to be an interpreter, a physical process capable of making use of some property of a molecule that offered a “semiotic affordance.” He proposes the model of an “autogenic virus,” the most primitive conceivable recursively self-maintaining kind of molecular system that could broach the boundary between physico-chemical process and “interpretive competence.” In this comment I work up to the question of how Deacon introduces concepts such as “representation” and “record” into his account, to argue that the autogen can pass on its lineage without a genetic template.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-01-21

Downloads
16 (#1,191,247)

6 months
8 (#583,676)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

How Molecules Became Signs.Terrence W. Deacon - forthcoming - Biosemiotics:1-23.

Add more references