Individual Differences in Comprehension of Contextualized Metaphors

Metaphor and Symbol 35 (4):285-301 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We report a study examining the role of linguistic context in modulating the influences of individual differences in fluid and crystalized intelligence on comprehension of literary metaphors. Three conditions were compared: no context, metaphor-congruent context, and literal-congruent context. Relative to the baseline no-context condition, the metaphor-congruent context facilitated comprehension of the metaphorical meaning whereas the literal-congruent context impaired it. Measures of fluid and crystalized intelligence both made separable contributions to predicting metaphor comprehension. The metaphor-congruent context selectively increased the contribution of crystalized verbal intelligence. These findings support the hypothesis that a supportive linguistic context encourages use of semantic integration in interpreting metaphors.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,793

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-10-29

Downloads
26 (#835,533)

6 months
8 (#528,772)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nicholas Ichien
London School of Economics

References found in this work

Metaphors We Live By.George Lakoff & Mark Johnson - 1980 - Ethics 93 (3):619-621.
Models and Metaphors: Studies in Language and Philosophy.Max Black - 1962 - Ithaca, N.Y.,: Cornell University Press.
More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor.George Lakoff & Mark Turner - 1990 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 48 (3):260-261.
The Career of Metaphor.Brian F. Bowdle & Dedre Gentner - 2005 - Psychological Review 112 (1):193-216.

View all 22 references / Add more references