Response to H. Floris Cohen's essay review on Newtonian scholarship [Book Review]

British Journal for the History of Science 52 (2):359-360 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a review of recent Newton scholarship, H. Floris Cohen charges that my paper is not a ‘case of worthwhile innovation, or even of any innovation at all’. I beg to differ.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,810

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Response to H. Floris Cohen's essay review on Newtonian scholarship.Mordechai Feingold - 2019 - British Journal for the History of Science 52 (2):353-357.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-07-23

Downloads
35 (#660,178)

6 months
4 (#1,262,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marius Stan
Boston College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Kant’s third law of mechanics: The long shadow of Leibniz.Marius Stan - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (3):493-504.
Stock and bulk in the latest Newton scholarship.H. Floris Cohen - 2018 - British Journal for the History of Science 51 (4):687-701.

Add more references