The Lord Scroop Fallacy

Informal Logic 20 (3) (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I identify a fallacy. The fallacy is worth noting for practical and theoretical reasons. First, the rampant occurrences ofthis fallacy-especially at moments calling for careful thought-indicate that it is more pernicious to clear thinking than many of those found in standard logic texts. Second, the fallacy stands apart from most others in that it contains multiple kinds oflogical error (i.e., fallacious and non-fallacious logical errors) that are themselves committed in abnormal ways, and thus it presents a two-tiered challenge to oversimplified accounts of how an argument can go bad

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Misuse of Bayes's Theorem.Michael Levin - 1999 - Informal Logic 19 (1).
Argument from Fallacy.Christian Cotton - 2018-05-09 - In Robert Arp, Steven Barbone & Michael Bruce (eds.), Bad Arguments. Wiley. pp. 125–127.
Fallacies of Accident.David Botting - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (2):267-289.
The One Fallacy Theory.Lawrence H. Powers - 1995 - Informal Logic 17 (2).
Indirect learning and the aims-curricula fallacy.Jonathan E. Adler - 1993 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 27 (2):223–232.
The Best Essay Ever: the fallacy of wishful thinking.Mark Maller - 2013 - Review of Contemporary Philosophy 12 (1):30-42.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
75 (#277,453)

6 months
20 (#143,008)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Circular Justifications.Harold I. Brown - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:406 - 414.

Add more references