Are disagreements about taste possible? A discussion of Kant's antinomy of taste.

Iowa Review 21 (2):66-71 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,270

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kant’s Antinomy of Taste and the Supersensible.Reed Winegar - 2021 - In Camilla Serck-Hanssen & Beatrix Himmelmann (eds.), The Court of Reason: Proceedings of the 13th International Kant Congress. De Gruyter. pp. 1095-1102.
On the Nature of Non-Doxastic Disagreement about Taste.Marián Zouhar - 2021 - In Tadeusz Ciecierski & Paweł Grabarczyk (eds.), Context Dependence in Language, Action, and Cognition. De Gruyter. pp. 41-62.
Disagreements about Taste vs. Disagreements about Moral Issues.Isidora Stojanovic - 2019 - American Philosophical Quarterly 56 (1):29-42.
Hume, Kant, and the "Antinomy of Taste".Timothy M. Costelloe - 2003 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (2):165-185.
Kant's theory of judgment, and judgments of taste: On Henry Allison's "Kant's theory of taste".Béatrice Longuenesse - 2003 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):143 – 163.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-02-12

Downloads
1 (#1,946,081)

6 months
1 (#1,890,334)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David G. Stern
University of Iowa

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references