Commentary: Koch on Kevorkian: Who Knows Best?

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (4):441-442 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Tom Koch's review of Jack Kevorkian's is a valuable look at this one (in)famous crusader's practices. The immediate question raised, and to which Koch provides his own perspectives, is what practical conclusions might be drawn from the final experiences and actions of this cohort of suffering individuals. My briefest and perhaps flippant answer is —including, unfortunately, those derived or hinted at by Koch himself

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Thieves of Virtue: When Bioethics Stole Medicine by Tom Koch (review).Tom L. Beauchamp - 2014 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 24 (3):11-14.
On the Subject(s) of Jack Kevorkian, M.D.: A Retrospective Analysis.Tom Koch - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (4):436-441.
Tom Koch, the limits of principle: Deciding who lives and what dies.Gregory E. Kaebnick - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (5):495-499.
Still the same dilemma for conceptual engineers: reply to Koch.Max Deutsch - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 178 (11):3659-3670.
Ram Dass on being a patient. Interview by Steve Heilig.R. Dass - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9 (3):435-438.
Stargazer vol. 1.Stephen Koch - 2014 - Open Road Integrated Media.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
56 (#386,330)

6 months
17 (#176,747)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references