Futility Determination as a Process: Problems with Medical Sovereignty, Legal Issues and the Strengths and Weakness of the Procedural Approach [Book Review]

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (2):155-163 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Futility is not a purely medical concept. Its subjective nature requires a balanced procedural approach where competing views can be aired and in which disputes can be resolved with procedural fairness. Law should play an important role in this process. Pure medical models of futility are based on a false claim of medical sovereignty. Procedural approaches avoid the problems of such claims. This paper examines the arguments for and against the adoption of a procedural approach to futility determination

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Futility, Conscientious Refusal, and Who Gets to Decide.J. K. Davis - 2008 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 33 (4):356-373.
Futility by any other name. The texas 10 day rule.Geoffrey Miller - 2008 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5 (4):265-270.
Medical futility: a cross-national study.Alireza Bagheri - 2013 - New Jersey: Imperial College Press.
Medical futility and its challenges: a review study.Maryam Aghabarary & Nahid Dehghan Nayeri - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine 9 (1).
A broader look at medical futility.Wayne Shelton - 1998 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (4):383-400.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-03-26

Downloads
88 (#237,781)

6 months
2 (#1,686,184)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Outsourcing of Ethical Thinking.Erik Nordenhaug & Jack Simmons - 2018 - Journal of Human Values 24 (2):138-149.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Principles of biomedical ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1989 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by James F. Childress.
Ethics and law for the health professions.Ian Kerridge - 1998 - Katoomba, N.S.W.: Social Science Press. Edited by Michael Lowe & John McPhee.

View all 11 references / Add more references