Reflexivity, role conflicts, and the meaning of English self pronouns

Manuscrito 45 (1):90-116 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This study offers an innovative, sign-based analysis of English self pronouns. While rejecting the traditional characterization of these forms as reflexive pronouns, the study borrows from the tradition by analyzing these forms as a kind of emphatic pronoun. The forms’ distribution can be explained by positing that they are semantic signals deployed by speakers to meet communicative goals. Speakers choose between self and simple pronouns when the additional meaning of self forms, INSISTENCE ON AN ENTITY, will steer hearers in particular interpretive directions. This approach has led to the discovery that reflexive uses of self pronouns are an instantiation of the general tendency to use these forms for unexpected messages, including those in which a single referent is playing more than one role at one time. The presence of such a role conflict accounts not only for reflexive uses, but also for the appearance of self pronouns in picture noun phrases, logophoric contexts, and other previously unexplained exceptions to the structural reflexivity account.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,072

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Covaluation and Unexpected BT Effects.Yael Sharvit - 2011 - Journal of Semantics 28 (1):55-106.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-01

Downloads
23 (#942,055)

6 months
15 (#207,985)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Language and nature.Noam Chomsky - 1995 - Mind 104 (413):1-61.
Functional syntax: anaphora, discourse, and empathy.Susumu Kuno - 1987 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Viewpoint, Reflexives, and the Nature of Noun Phrases.W. R. Cantrall - 1976 - Foundations of Language 14 (4):601-604.
Concept, Image, and Symbol. [REVIEW]H. Stephen Straight & Matthew T. Davidson - 1993 - International Studies in Philosophy 25 (3):137-138.

Add more references