Philosophical approaches to classifications of sciences: biology

Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (1):36-42 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper analyzes the phenomenon of classification of sciences as a subject of philosophical investigations. What is going on at the object- and the meta- levels of classifications of sciences? What is the structure of the meta-level of scientific classifications? The paper discusses the possibilities and limitations of philosophical approaches to the construction and analysis of scientific classifica­tions. Social epistemology and historical epistemology have shown to be the most effective in analyzing both scientific classifications and classifications of sciences. The paper discusses substantive, methodological, cultural, and historical criteria of scientific classi­fications as they are applied to contemporary biology. Some of the contemporary problems of scientific classifications are considered through the reading of biological disciplinary classifications. It is shown that the classification disciplines in biology is organized ac­cording to the ontological, epistemological and social frameworks.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Disciplinary classifications and normative regulation of science.Ilya T. Kasavin - 2018 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (1):23-30.
Computer Science: features of Russian classification.Tatiana D. Sokolova - 2018 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (1):31-35.
Socio – technical disciplines in scientific classifications.Alexandra A. Argamakova - 2018 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (1):48-51.
Engineering: aspects of the object field construction.Evgeniy V. Maslanov - 2018 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (1):43-47.
Close encounters with scientific analogies of the third kind.Francesco Nappo - 2021 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (3):1-20.
Le naturel est artificiel : l’héritage de la scientia scientiarum.Hope A. Olson, Jihee Beak & Inkyung Choi - 2013 - Hermès: La Revue Cognition, communication, politique 66 (2):, [ p.].
What good is realism about natural kinds?Ana-Maria Creţu & Ana-Maria Cretu - 2018 - Dissertation, University of Edinburgh
Radical pluralism, classificatory norms and the legitimacy of species classifications.Stijn Conix - 2019 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 73:27-34.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-05-16

Downloads
11 (#1,418,507)

6 months
4 (#1,247,585)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references