Kant and the Scandal of Intersubjectivity: Alfred Schutz’s Anthropology of Transcendence

In Cynthia D. Coe, The Palgrave Handbook of German Idealism and Phenomenology. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 131-152 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Alfred Schutz agreed with Husserl that our objective world is based on an interrelation among a plurality of subjects. But to grasp this “intersubjective” dimension, Schutz argued, we need an “anthropology on a phenomenological basis.” A key notion of such an anthropology is that we experience the world and the other subjects as “transcending” us. Human experience is inherently open to an “Other.” However, Schutz’s philosophy of a transcendence immanent to experience remained unfinished. It can be further developed with the help of Kant, to whom Schutz had referred since the 1920s. Kant’s distinction between “appearances” and “things in themselves” can be read as an anthropological account of how human experience propels itself into the unknown without ever crossing its boundaries.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,401

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-01

Downloads
11 (#1,459,590)

6 months
1 (#1,572,794)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jan Strassheim
University of Tokyo

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references