Why the mind has a body: Reply to professor Bakewell

Philosophical Review 13 (3):337-342 (1904)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/2176286

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,401

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Reply to Professor Bakewell.C. A. Strong - 1904 - Philosophical Review 13 (3):337-342.
Professor Bakewell on the ego.C. A. Strong - 1904 - Philosophical Review 13 (5):546-552.
Why the Mind has a Body.Charles M. Bakewell - 1904 - Philosophical Review 13 (2):220.
Why the mind has a body: A rejoinder.C. M. Bakewell - 1904 - Philosophical Review 13 (3):342-346.
A reply to professor Ducasse.A. Cornelius Benjamin - 1954 - Philosophical Review 63 (1):91-92.
A reply to professor Weitz.Herbert Kamins - 1952 - Philosophical Review 61 (1):66-71.
Reply to Professor Angell's Criticism of Analytic Psychology.G. F. Stout - 1898 - Philosophical Review 7 (1):72-76.
Reply to professor Angell's criticism of analytic psychology.G. F. Stout - 1898 - Philosophical Review 7 (1):72-76.
On resemblance: In reply to professor Ducasse.Ralph W. Church - 1940 - Philosophical Review 49 (6):648-662.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
35 (#678,037)

6 months
7 (#469,699)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Radical Empiricism, Critical Realism, and American Functionalism: James and Sellars.Gary Hatfield - 2015 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 5 (1):129-53.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references