Explaining normative–deliberative gaps is essential to dual-process theorizing

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e143 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We discuss significant challenges to assumptions of exclusivity and highlight methodological and conceptual pitfalls in inferring deliberative processes from reasoning responses. Causes of normative–deliberative gaps are considered (e.g., disputed or misunderstood normative standards, strategy preferences, task interpretations, cognitive ability, mindware and thinking dispositions) and a soft normativist approach is recommended for developing the dual-process 2.0 architecture.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,217

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Deliberative Democracy.Thomas Christiano & Sameer Bajaj - 2016 - In Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen, Kimberley Brownlee & David Coady (eds.), A Companion to Applied Philosophy. Malden, MA: Wiley. pp. 383–396.
Advancing theorizing about fast-and-slow thinking.Wim De Neys - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e111.
Normativism versus mechanism.Valerie A. Thompson - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5):272-273.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-07-19

Downloads
12 (#1,396,594)

6 months
2 (#1,525,666)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?