Appendix 3 Nomic: A Game of Self-Amendment [Note 1]

Abstract

If law-making is a game, then it is a game in which changing the rules is a move. Lawmaking is more than changing the rules of law-making, of course, and more than a game. But a real game may model the self-amending character of the legal system and leave the rest out. While self-amendment appears to be an esoteric feature of law, capturing it in a game creates a remarkably complete microcosm of a functional legal system.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,369

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Game theory in jurisprudence.Wojciech Załuski - 2013 - Kraków: Copernicus Center Press.
Cyberspace Outlaws – Coding the Online World.Morgan M. Broman, Pamela Finckenberg-Broman & Susan Bird - 2024 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 37 (4):1153-1183.
Game Over! Legal Responses to Video Game Violence.Kevin Barton - 2002 - Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy 16 (1):133-172.
Game theory and the law.Jerzy Stelmach & Wojciech Załuski (eds.) - 2011 - Kraków: Copernicus Center Press.
Classical versus evolutionary game theory.Herbert Gintis - 2000 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 7 (1-2):1-2.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
9 (#1,530,602)

6 months
9 (#504,609)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Suber
Harvard University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references