A queer feminist posthuman framework for bioethics: on vulnerability, antimicrobial resistance, and justice

Monash Bioethics Review:1-17 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I discuss the bioethical principle of justice and the bioethical key concept of vulnerability, in a queer feminist posthuman framework. I situate these contemplations, philosophical by nature, in the context of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), one the most vicious moral problems of our time. Further, I discuss how gender and sexual variance, vulnerability and justice manifest in AMR. I conclude by considering my queer feminist posthuman framework for vulnerability and justice in relation to the notion of antibiotic vulnerabilities, suggesting a lacuna for further AMR research.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,676

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Elucidating the concept of vulnerability: Layers not labels.Florencia Luna - 2009 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 2 (1):121-139.
Why bioethics needs a concept of vulnerability.Wendy Rogers, Catriona Mackenzie & Susan Dodds - 2012 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 5 (2):11-38.
Feminist Bioethicists and COVID-19: Notes on Vulnerability and Its Missed Chances.Tiia Sudenkaarne - 2022 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 15 (1):112-116.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-11-14

Downloads
3 (#1,849,218)

6 months
3 (#1,470,969)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

A Critique of Principlism.K. D. Clouser & B. Gert - 1990 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15 (2):219-236.
Why bioethics needs a concept of vulnerability.Wendy Rogers, Catriona Mackenzie & Susan Dodds - 2012 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 5 (2):11-38.

View all 27 references / Add more references