Bi-Level Evidentialism and Reformed Apologetics

Faith and Philosophy 11 (3):379-396 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Evidentialism and Theology.Scott A. Shalkowski - 1992 - Faith and Philosophy 9 (2):249-258.
An Apology for Apologetics.Paul J. Griffiths - 1988 - Faith and Philosophy 5 (4):399-420.
An Apology for Apologetics. [REVIEW]James Wetzel - 1994 - Faith and Philosophy 11 (1):152-156.
Introducing Apologetics. [REVIEW]Paul J. Griffiths - 2011 - Faith and Philosophy 28 (3):359-365.
Evidentialism and the Will to Believe, by Scott F. Aikin.Michael Pace - 2017 - Faith and Philosophy 34 (4):489-496.
Tayloring Reformed Epistemology. [REVIEW]James Beilby - 2010 - Faith and Philosophy 27 (4):470-474.
Evidence is Required for Religious Belief.Blake McAllister - 2019 - In Michael Peterson & Ray VanArragon (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion, 2nd edition. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 269-278.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
68 (#311,751)

6 months
13 (#267,677)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Sudduth
San Francisco State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Two types of foundationalism.William P. Alston - 1976 - Journal of Philosophy 73 (7):165-185.

Add more references