Sacking of democratic governments in pakistan: A critical review

Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 57 (1):141-150 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A commonly accepted definition of the democracy is; “Rule of the majority by the supreme power vested in the people and exercised by them directly”. The democratic government may remain in power until and unless people repose the confidence over it. In Pakistan the main reason of failure of the democracy is that, it is generally against the social behavior of Pakistan. Just because of this the democracy could not come around in Pakistan, yet people cannot be incriminated for the same. The history is witnessed that Pakistani people had supported all social movements having collective ambitions but unluckily after freedom no political party or leadership was available to Pakistanis which could do something for them. Soon after freedom bureaucrats had prevalence in the government due to this the overall control remained in the hands of Governor General or non-representatives. So, democratic institutions could not attain freedom from them. Undoubtedly from the beginning the Pakistan Army attained a dominating role in the system of government and in the field of politics and during the last 60 years they remained in rule for more than a half of the tenure and the political governments were never allowed to take any step freely. In the current scenario Pakistan should have to pass through a democratic way which was stopped by the Armed forces and bureaucracy by adopting different means.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Enlightened moderation under Pervez musharraf regime.Afshan Aziz & Tanweer Khalid - 2017 - Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 56 (1):113-122.
Governance at Grass Roots Level in Pakistan: A Historical Perspective.Khalil Shaikh - 2024 - Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 63 (1):97-107.
Needed but Unwanted. Thomas Hobbes’s Warnings on the Dangers of Multitude, Populism and Democracy.Mikko Jakonen - 2016 - Las Torres de Lucca: Revista Internacional de Filosofía Política 5 (9):89-118.
the Uncanny Proximity: From Democracy To Terror.Farhang Erfani - 2002 - Florida Philosophical Review 2 (2):5-22.
The policy failures of central governments during east bengal crisis, 1947-71.Kashif Iqbal - 2019 - Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 58 (2):107-119.
Determinants of youth emigration: A case study of karachi.Ammad Zafar - 2021 - Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 60 (1):45-62.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-10-14

Downloads
10 (#1,464,485)

6 months
5 (#1,013,271)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references