Deterrent Punishment in Utilitarianism

Abstract

This is a presentation of the utilitarian approach to punishment. It is meant for students. A note added in July, 2022 advises the reader about the author's current views on some topics in the paper. The first section discusses Bentham's psychological hedonism. The second briefly criticizes it. The third section explains abstractly how utilitarianism would determine of the right amount of punishment. The fourth section applies the theory to some cases, and brings out how utilitarianism could favor punishments more or less severe than the lex talionis.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

A non-utilitarian approach to punishment.H. J. McCloskey - 1965 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 8 (1-4):249 – 263.
Kant on punishment.Nelson Potter - 2009 - In Thomas E. Hill, The Blackwell Guide to Kant's Ethics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 179–195.
State Punishment and the Death Penalty.David Dolinko - 2003 - In R. G. Frey & Christopher Heath Wellman, A Companion to Applied Ethics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 75–88.
A utilitarian reply to dr. McCloskey.T. L. S. Sprigge - 1965 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 8 (1-4):264 – 291.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-05-18

Downloads
36,758 (#59)

6 months
1,935 (#339)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Steven Sverdlik
Southern Methodist University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references